A working list of patterns
The pattern-naming below is that of Bollier and Helfrich, work in progress (July 2018) in their federated wiki.
Their overall framing differs from FoP RoP (see pattern language - Alexander, Bollier & Helfrich) and the nature of the action that they contemplate is perhaps in a different mode (more institutional, less experiential). But these patterns are well-founded in cultural-historical study, and will in one form or another make an appearance in the FoP RoP architecture.
Provisioning
Share the risks of provisioning
Make & use together
Honour care & decommodify work
Pool & share
Pool, cap & divide-up
Pool, cap & mutualize
Trade with price-sovereignty
Use convivial tools
Rely on distributed structures
Produce cosmo-locally
Creatively adapt & renew
Social life
Cultivate shared purpose & values
Strengthen the nested (Widen? Multiply? Deepen)
Contribute freely (without coercion)
Practice gentle reciprocity
Ritualize togetherness
Trust situated knowing (also: knowledge)
Deepen communion with nature
Preserve relationships in addressing conflicts
Reflect on your peer governance
Peer governance
Keep commons & commerce distinct
Bring diversity into shared purpose
Create semi-permeable membranes
Assure consent in decision making
Rely on heterarchy
Relationalize property
Honor transparency in a sphere of trust
Share knowledge generously
Finance commons provisioning
Peer-monitor & use graduated sanctions
This threefold organisation differs in important ways from the threefold frame of Ostrom (resources/community/governance), which can be seen as an inappropriate, structural-functionalist categorisation. It can be seen as quite close to the threefold framing of commoning practices in foprop (curating/enjoying/stewarding - in this order) and both of these can be mapped into the core foprop landscape caegories: §1 material provisioning, §2 knowing and organising, §3 valuing and recognising (also in this order). More on this anon, in particular patterns.
Previous | Realms of commoning